WallStSmart

Coca-Cola European Partners PLC (CCEP)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 315% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $20.90B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 9.3%. CCEP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.64. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CCEP

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.55

PG

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CCEPSignificantly Overvalued (-64.8%)

Margin of Safety

-64.8%

Fair Value

$59.24

Current Price

$94.57

$35.33 premium

UndervaluedFair: $59.24Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-36.1%)

Margin of Safety

-36.1%

Fair Value

$107.56

Current Price

$146.42

$38.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $107.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCEP3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
68.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 68.3% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.51B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$340.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.03B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CCEP4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.503/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PG1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCEP

The strongest argument for CCEP centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bear Case : CCEP

The primary concerns for CCEP are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCEP profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CCEP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

PG is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (61/100 vs 59/100), backed by strong 19.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola European Partners PLC

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC produces, distributes and sells a variety of ready-to-drink non-alcoholic beverages. The company is headquartered in Uxbridge, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?