WallStSmart

CareDx Inc (CDNA)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 813% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $412.82M). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -2.0%. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

CDNA

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.40

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CDNAUndervalued (+57.7%)

Margin of Safety

+57.7%

Fair Value

$46.59

Current Price

$28.82

$17.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.59Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.0%)

Margin of Safety

-84.0%

Fair Value

$178.93

Current Price

$374.41

$195.48 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CDNA2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.0%10/10

Revenue surging 39.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CDNA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.20B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

Operating margin of 1.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.644/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CDNA

The strongest argument for CDNA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 39.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CDNA

The primary concerns for CDNA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. A P/E of 47.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CDNA profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CDNA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.48 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

CDNA generates stronger free cash flow (514,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 37/100) and 91.4% revenue growth. CDNA offers better value entry with a 57.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CareDx Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

CareDx, Inc. discovers, develops and markets diagnostic solutions for transplant patients and caregivers globally. The company is headquartered in South San Francisco, California.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?