WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsTeck Resources Ltd Class B (TECK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Teck Resources Ltd Class B generates 30% more annual revenue ($12.41B vs $9.54B). TECK leads profitability with a 14.9% profit margin vs -12.2%. CE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.42. TECK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.30

TECK

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 1.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEUndervalued (+48.6%)

Margin of Safety

+48.6%

Fair Value

$117.86

Current Price

$65.09

$52.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $117.86Overvalued
TECKUndervalued (+9.1%)

Margin of Safety

+9.1%

Fair Value

$66.42

Current Price

$58.43

$7.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $66.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

TECK4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
72.2%10/10

Revenue surging 72.2% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
128.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 128.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-22.5%2/10

ROE of -22.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.5%2/10

Revenue declined 6.5%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.302/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TECK3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.934/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
5.9%3/10

ROE of 5.9% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
5.472/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : TECK

The strongest argument for TECK centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 72.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : TECK

The primary concerns for TECK are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CE profiles as a turnaround stock while TECK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TECK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.56 — expect wider price swings.

TECK is growing revenue faster at 72.2% — sustainability is the question.

TECK generates stronger free cash flow (344M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TECK scores higher overall (73/100 vs 47/100) and 72.2% revenue growth. CE offers better value entry with a 48.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Teck Resources Ltd Class B

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

Teck Resources Limited is dedicated to exploring, acquiring, developing and producing natural resources in Asia, Europe and North America. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?