WallStSmart

Celanese Corporation (CE)vsHuntsman Corporation (HUN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Celanese Corporation generates 67% more annual revenue ($9.49B vs $5.69B). HUN leads profitability with a -5.8% profit margin vs -11.6%. HUN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. HUN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CE

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28

HUN

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.67
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CEUndervalued (+29.1%)

Margin of Safety

+29.1%

Fair Value

$85.47

Current Price

$51.03

$34.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $85.47Overvalued
HUNSignificantly Overvalued (-22.6%)

Margin of Safety

-22.6%

Fair Value

$11.47

Current Price

$14.21

$2.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.47Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.2% YoY

HUN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

CE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-26.9%2/10

ROE of -26.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Revenue declined 2.2%

HUN4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.7%4/10

0.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CE

The strongest argument for CE centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : HUN

The strongest argument for HUN centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CE

The primary concerns for CE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : HUN

The primary concerns for HUN are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

HUN is growing revenue faster at 0.7% — sustainability is the question.

CE generates stronger free cash flow (10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CHEMICALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

HUN scores higher overall (49/100 vs 47/100). CE offers better value entry with a 29.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Celanese Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Celanese Corporation is a Fortune 500 global technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas, United States.

Huntsman Corporation

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Huntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemicals globally. The company is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?