WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)vsNextera Energy Inc (NEE)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nextera Energy Inc generates 221% more annual revenue ($28.82B vs $8.97B). NEE leads profitability with a 40.4% profit margin vs 9.7%. NEE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.71. NEE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

CMS

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

NEE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.72

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NEE6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Profit MarginProfitability
40.4%10/10

Keeps 40 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
33.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$175.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CMS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.494/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Operating MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

Operating margin of 2.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.5%2/10

Earnings declined 57.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-468.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NEE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.714/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.853/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMS

The strongest argument for CMS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : NEE

The strongest argument for NEE centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 40.4% and operating margin at 33.0%.

Bear Case : CMS

The primary concerns for CMS are PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.08 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : NEE

The primary concerns for NEE are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.85 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NEE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.64 — expect wider price swings.

CMS is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

CMS generates stronger free cash flow (-468M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NEE scores higher overall (70/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 40.4% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CMS Energy (NYSE: CMS), based in Jackson, Michigan, is an energy company that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan.

Visit Website →

Nextera Energy Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

NextEra Energy, Inc. is an American energy company with about 46 gigawatts of generating capacity, revenues of over $17 billion in 2017, and about 14,000 employees throughout the US and Canada. Its subsidiaries include Florida Power & Light (FPL), NextEra Energy Resources, NextEra Energy Partners, Gulf Power Company, and NextEra Energy Services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?