WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)vsNextera Energy Inc (NEE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nextera Energy Inc generates 226% more annual revenue ($28.70B vs $8.81B). NEE leads profitability with a 32.4% profit margin vs 11.6%. NEE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.90. NEE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CMS

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

NEE

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.72

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NEE5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
32.4%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
53.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.1% YoY

Market CapQuality
$181.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CMS4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.782/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.5%2/10

Revenue declined 0.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.9%2/10

Earnings declined 43.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-334.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NEE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-11.42B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.722/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMS

The strongest argument for CMS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : NEE

The strongest argument for NEE centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 32.4% and operating margin at 31.5%. Revenue growth of 12.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CMS

The primary concerns for CMS are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : NEE

The primary concerns for NEE are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMS profiles as a declining stock while NEE is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

NEE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

NEE is growing revenue faster at 12.4% — sustainability is the question.

CMS generates stronger free cash flow (-334M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NEE scores higher overall (71/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 32.4% margins and 12.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CMS Energy (NYSE: CMS), based in Jackson, Michigan, is an energy company that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan.

Visit Website →

Nextera Energy Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

NextEra Energy, Inc. is an American energy company with about 46 gigawatts of generating capacity, revenues of over $17 billion in 2017, and about 14,000 employees throughout the US and Canada. Its subsidiaries include Florida Power & Light (FPL), NextEra Energy Resources, NextEra Energy Partners, Gulf Power Company, and NextEra Energy Services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?