WallStSmart

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 242% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $8.81B). SO leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 11.6%. SO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.41. SO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

CMS

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

SO

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CMS.

SOSignificantly Overvalued (-50.6%)

Margin of Safety

-50.6%

Fair Value

$61.82

Current Price

$92.69

$30.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $61.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CMS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SO4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$107.10B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
30.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 30.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

CMS4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.782/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.5%2/10

Revenue declined 0.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.9%2/10

Earnings declined 43.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-334.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.1%4/10

0.1% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CMS

The strongest argument for CMS centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 29.6%.

Bear Case : CMS

The primary concerns for CMS are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CMS profiles as a declining stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

SO is growing revenue faster at 0.1% — sustainability is the question.

CMS generates stronger free cash flow (-334M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SO scores higher overall (66/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CMS Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CMS Energy (NYSE: CMS), based in Jackson, Michigan, is an energy company that is focused principally on utility operations in Michigan.

Visit Website →

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?