WallStSmart

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 125% more annual revenue ($2.21B vs $984.40M). CPK leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs -7.7%. CPK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.24. CPK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

CPK

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.97

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CPKSignificantly Overvalued (-24.3%)

Margin of Safety

-24.3%

Fair Value

$104.88

Current Price

$123.78

$18.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $104.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CPK3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.2%8/10

18.2% revenue growth

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CPK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.244/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.013/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-23.90M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CPK

The strongest argument for CPK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 28.1%. Revenue growth of 18.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : CPK

The primary concerns for CPK are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CPK profiles as a growth stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CPK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

CPK is growing revenue faster at 18.2% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (93M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CPK scores higher overall (65/100 vs 33/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 18.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is a power supply company. The company is headquartered in Dover, Delaware.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?