WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsOoma Inc (OOMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 1658% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $289.72M). OOMA leads profitability with a 3.2% profit margin vs -0.6%. OOMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. OOMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

OOMA

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.83
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-82.3%)

Margin of Safety

-82.3%

Fair Value

$99.74

Current Price

$181.80

$82.06 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.74Overvalued
OOMAUndervalued (+28.0%)

Margin of Safety

+28.0%

Fair Value

$15.76

Current Price

$21.88

$6.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $15.76Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$191.86B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

OOMA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.8%8/10

Revenue surging 24.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
40.0x2/10

Trading at 40.0x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

OOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$550.05M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OOMA

The strongest argument for OOMA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : OOMA

The primary concerns for OOMA are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. A P/E of 60.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

OOMA scores higher overall (48/100 vs 39/100) and 24.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Ooma Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ooma, Inc. creates connected experiences for businesses and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?