WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsOoma Inc (OOMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 1659% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $273.60M). OOMA leads profitability with a 2.4% profit margin vs -3.4%. OOMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. OOMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.98

OOMA

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDOvervalued (-11.3%)

Margin of Safety

-11.3%

Fair Value

$400.68

Current Price

$445.75

$45.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $400.68Overvalued
OOMAUndervalued (+60.6%)

Margin of Safety

+60.6%

Fair Value

$28.82

Current Price

$16.32

$12.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$114.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

OOMA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
25.5x2/10

Trading at 25.5x book value

OOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$453.33M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OOMA

Revenue growth of 14.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : OOMA

The primary concerns for OOMA are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. A P/E of 71.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while OOMA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OOMA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OOMA scores higher overall (46/100 vs 40/100) and 14.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Ooma Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ooma, Inc. creates connected experiences for businesses and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?