WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 1% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs -3.4%. Q appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.41. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$120.26

$97.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while Q is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (49/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?