WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 114% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $4.95B). Q leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 8.0%. Q appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

Q

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 3.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.35
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$470.35

Current Price

$285.26

$185.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $470.35Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for Q.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$231.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Q2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
22.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.6%8/10

17.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.4x4/10

Trading at 8.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
50.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-21.7%2/10

Earnings declined 21.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 17.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 247.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 50.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while Q is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (51/100 vs 47/100) and 17.6% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 38.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?