WallStSmart

Cintas Corporation (CTAS)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 44% more annual revenue ($11.03B vs $7.66B). TRI leads profitability with a 19.9% profit margin vs 17.6%. TRI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CTAS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29

TRI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-38.5%)

Margin of Safety

-38.5%

Fair Value

$144.61

Current Price

$179.85

$35.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $144.61Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-53.2%)

Margin of Safety

-53.2%

Fair Value

$58.22

Current Price

$86.04

$27.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $58.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$69.92B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.2%

TRI2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.0x4/10

Trading at 15.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.802/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TRI0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.2%.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.9% and operating margin at 30.3%. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TRI

No major red flags identified for TRI, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTAS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.8% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (531M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TRI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 19.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?