WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsService Properties Trust (SVC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Service Properties Trust generates 54% more annual revenue ($1.74B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs -13.6%. SVC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.27. CUBE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.43

SVC

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -0.36
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+27.0%)

Margin of Safety

+27.0%

Fair Value

$52.92

Current Price

$40.31

$12.61 discount

UndervaluedFair: $52.92Overvalued
SVCUndervalued (+67.2%)

Margin of Safety

+67.2%

Fair Value

$7.02

Current Price

$1.65

$5.37 discount

UndervaluedFair: $7.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

SVC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.323/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SVC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.274/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.06B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-38.6%2/10

ROE of -38.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-16.3%2/10

Revenue declined 16.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : SVC

The strongest argument for SVC centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : SVC

The primary concerns for SVC are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 10.30 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE profiles as a value stock while SVC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SVC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

CUBE is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

CUBE generates stronger free cash flow (149M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (49/100 vs 34/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins. SVC offers better value entry with a 67.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Service Properties Trust

REAL ESTATE · REIT - HOTEL & MOTEL · USA

Service Properties Trust is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns a diverse portfolio of hotel and net-leasing services and need-based retail properties in the United States and in Puerto Rico and Canada with 149 different brands across 23 industries. The company is headquartered in Newton, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?