WallStSmart

CubeSmart (CUBE)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 9134% more annual revenue ($104.78B vs $1.13B). CUBE leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 3.5%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.44. CUBE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CUBE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.57

TGT

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CUBEUndervalued (+33.7%)

Margin of Safety

+33.7%

Fair Value

$58.21

Current Price

$40.46

$17.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.21Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+33.2%)

Margin of Safety

+33.2%

Fair Value

$171.51

Current Price

$125.25

$46.26 discount

UndervaluedFair: $171.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CUBE2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$56.89B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CUBE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.444/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.5%2/10

Revenue declined 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CUBE

The strongest argument for CUBE centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 40.3%.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : CUBE

The primary concerns for CUBE are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CUBE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

CUBE is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REIT - INDUSTRIAL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CUBE scores higher overall (49/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins. TGT offers better value entry with a 33.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CubeSmart

REAL ESTATE · REIT - INDUSTRIAL · USA

CubeSmart is a self-managed and self-managed real estate investment trust.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?