WallStSmart

CPI Aerostructures Inc (CVU)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 14948% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $69.26M). OSK leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs -1.2%. CVU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

CVU

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.68

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CVUUndervalued (+68.3%)

Margin of Safety

+68.3%

Fair Value

$12.04

Current Price

$3.60

$8.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $12.04Overvalued
OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CVU2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CVU4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$46.89M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.043/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.3%2/10

ROE of -3.3% — below average capital efficiency

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CVU

The strongest argument for CVU centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CVU

The primary concerns for CVU are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CVU profiles as a turnaround stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 40/100). CVU offers better value entry with a 68.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CPI Aerostructures Inc

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is engaged in contract production of aircraft structural parts for fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters in the commercial and defense markets. The company is headquartered in Edgewood, New York.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?