WallStSmart

Consolidated Water Co Ltd (CWCO)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 23413% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $128.33M). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 13.5%. CWCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.35. SO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CWCO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 6.49

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWCOOvervalued (-14.5%)

Margin of Safety

-14.5%

Fair Value

$32.51

Current Price

$29.92

$2.59 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.51Overvalued
SOSignificantly Overvalued (-47.7%)

Margin of Safety

-47.7%

Fair Value

$62.70

Current Price

$92.60

$29.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $62.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWCO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.4910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$102.01B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

Areas to Watch

CWCO4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$480.97M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWCO

The strongest argument for CWCO centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CWCO

The primary concerns for CWCO are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWCO profiles as a declining stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWCO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.51 — expect wider price swings.

SO is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

CWCO generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SO scores higher overall (56/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Consolidated Water Co Ltd

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. designs, builds, manages and operates water treatment and production plants primarily in the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas and the United States. The company is headquartered in Grand Cayman, the Cayman Islands.

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?