WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsTXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 1368% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $2.23B). DUK leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs 8.8%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. TXNM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

TXNM

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-76.3%)

Margin of Safety

-76.3%

Fair Value

$66.67

Current Price

$116.31

$49.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $66.67Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TXNM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$93.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

TXNM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
190.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 190.9% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.5%

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.673/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TXNM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.552/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bull Case : TXNM

The strongest argument for TXNM centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.67 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TXNM

The primary concerns for TXNM are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.36 — expect wider price swings.

TXNM is growing revenue faster at 9.2% — sustainability is the question.

TXNM generates stronger free cash flow (-195M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (63/100 vs 63/100), backed by strong 16.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

TXNM Energy, Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

TXNM Energy, Inc., provides electricity and electric services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?