WallStSmart

Southern Company (SO)vsTXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 1251% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $2.23B). SO leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 8.8%. SO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.41. SO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

SO

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65

TXNM

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SOSignificantly Overvalued (-50.6%)

Margin of Safety

-50.6%

Fair Value

$61.82

Current Price

$92.69

$30.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $61.82Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TXNM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SO4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$107.10B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
30.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 30.4% YoY

TXNM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
190.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 190.9% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

Areas to Watch

SO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.1%4/10

0.1% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TXNM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 29.6%.

Bull Case : TXNM

The strongest argument for TXNM centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TXNM

The primary concerns for TXNM are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.33 — expect wider price swings.

TXNM is growing revenue faster at 9.2% — sustainability is the question.

TXNM generates stronger free cash flow (-160M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SO scores higher overall (66/100 vs 63/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

TXNM Energy, Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

TXNM Energy, Inc., provides electricity and electric services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?