WallStSmart

Ecolab Inc (ECL)vsMako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ecolab Inc generates 10981% more annual revenue ($16.45B vs $148.47M). MAKO leads profitability with a 22.7% profit margin vs 12.8%. MAKO trades at a lower P/E of 19.8x. MAKO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

ECL

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.30

MAKO

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ECL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$72.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

MAKO5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Operating MarginProfitability
45.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
74.7%10/10

Revenue surging 74.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
209.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 209.8% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
22.7%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

ECL3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MAKO1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$711.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ECL

The strongest argument for ECL centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : MAKO

The strongest argument for MAKO centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.7% and operating margin at 45.5%. Revenue growth of 74.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ECL

The primary concerns for ECL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MAKO

The primary concerns for MAKO are Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ECL profiles as a value stock while MAKO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAKO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.68 — expect wider price swings.

MAKO is growing revenue faster at 74.7% — sustainability is the question.

ECL generates stronger free cash flow (97M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAKO scores higher overall (68/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 22.7% margins and 74.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ecolab Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Ecolab Inc., headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, is an American corporation that develops and offers services, technology and systems that specialize in water treatment, purification, cleaning and hygiene in a wide variety of applications. It helps organizations both private market as well as public treat their water, not only for drinking directly, but also for use in food, healthcare, hospitality related safety and industry.

Mako Mining Corp Common Stock

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

None

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?