WallStSmart

Consolidated Edison Inc (ED)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Consolidated Edison Inc generates 681% more annual revenue ($17.69B vs $2.27B). ED leads profitability with a 12.5% profit margin vs -1.0%. ED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.16. ED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

ED

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.97

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EDSignificantly Overvalued (-73.9%)

Margin of Safety

-73.9%

Fair Value

$63.18

Current Price

$106.46

$43.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $63.18Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ED3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.1% YoY

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

ED4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.164/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.103/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.972/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ED

The strongest argument for ED centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ED

The primary concerns for ED are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ED profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

ED is growing revenue faster at 13.2% — sustainability is the question.

ED generates stronger free cash flow (624M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ED scores higher overall (65/100 vs 43/100) and 13.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Consolidated Edison Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison (stylized as conEdison) or ConEd, is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues as of 2017, and over $48 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?