WallStSmart

Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)vsSprouts Farmers Market LLC (SFM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Estee Lauder Companies Inc generates 67% more annual revenue ($14.67B vs $8.81B). SFM leads profitability with a 6.0% profit margin vs -1.2%. SFM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. SFM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

EL

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

SFM

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 8.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EL.

SFMUndervalued (+65.9%)

Margin of Safety

+65.9%

Fair Value

$192.43

Current Price

$77.40

$115.03 discount

UndervaluedFair: $192.43Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.02B8/10

Generating 1.0B in free cash flow

SFM3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
38.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 38 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.774/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.3%2/10

ROE of -4.3% — below average capital efficiency

SFM3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.393/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EL

The strongest argument for EL centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SFM

The strongest argument for SFM centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SFM

The primary concerns for SFM are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EL profiles as a turnaround stock while SFM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

SFM is growing revenue faster at 7.6% — sustainability is the question.

EL generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SFM scores higher overall (62/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Sprouts Farmers Market LLC

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · GROCERY STORES · USA

Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. offers fresh, natural and organic food products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?