WallStSmart

Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 244% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $14.67B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs -121.0%. EL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.83. UL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

EL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EL.

ULSignificantly Overvalued (-269.3%)

Margin of Safety

-269.3%

Fair Value

$20.20

Current Price

$62.35

$42.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.20Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.02B8/10

Generating 1.0B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$142.97B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.3%2/10

ROE of -4.3% — below average capital efficiency

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.984/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EL

The strongest argument for EL centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EL profiles as a turnaround stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

EL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

EL is growing revenue faster at 5.6% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UL scores higher overall (50/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 18.8% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?