Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsFLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$19.62
-0.89%
ENERGY · Cap: $67.24B
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
$29.77
+0.54%
ENERGY · Cap: $1.61B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 27071% more annual revenue ($92.29B vs $339.66M). FLNG leads profitability with a 22.3% profit margin vs 4.7%. ET trades at a lower P/E of 16.3x. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
ET
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
FLNG
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.0%
Fair Value
$138.44
Current Price
$19.61
$118.83 discount
Margin of Safety
-35.6%
Fair Value
$19.19
Current Price
$29.77
$10.58 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.5B in free cash flow
Strong operational efficiency at 42.5%
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 3.6%
Elevated debt levels
4.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 9.0%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : FLNG
The strongest argument for FLNG centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.3% and operating margin at 42.5%.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.06 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : FLNG
The primary concerns for FLNG are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.61 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while FLNG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (65/100 vs 46/100) and 32.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
FLEX LNG Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Flex LNG Ltd., is dedicated to the global shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?