WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsFluor Corporation (FLR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 58% more annual revenue ($15.18B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 2.3%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.10. FLR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

FLR

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

FLROvervalued (-7.3%)

Margin of Safety

-7.3%

Fair Value

$47.29

Current Price

$50.41

$3.12 premium

UndervaluedFair: $47.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

FLR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1427.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1427.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

FLR3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.0%2/10

Revenue declined 8.0%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Operating margin of -1.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Operating Margin. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLR scores higher overall (58/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?