WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsFluor Corporation (FLR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 61% more annual revenue ($15.50B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. FLR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

FLR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

FLRUndervalued (+45.6%)

Margin of Safety

+45.6%

Fair Value

$87.05

Current Price

$54.20

$32.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $87.05Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

FLR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1427.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1427.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
48.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

FLR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

Operating margin of 2.0%

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.7%2/10

ROE of -1.7% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.0%2/10

Revenue declined 2.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-378.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 48.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Operating Margin, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while FLR is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.30 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?