WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsIES Holdings Inc (IESC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 147% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $3.99B). IESC leads profitability with a 11.4% profit margin vs 6.2%. IESC trades at a lower P/E of 30.4x. IESC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

IESC

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 4.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

IESC5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
37.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.6%10/10

Revenue surging 39.6% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
98.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 98.7% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.7310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

IESC3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.2x4/10

Trading at 11.2x book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-15.12M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : IESC

The strongest argument for IESC centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 39.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : IESC

The primary concerns for IESC are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while IESC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IESC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.78 — expect wider price swings.

IESC is growing revenue faster at 39.6% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IESC scores higher overall (64/100 vs 38/100) and 39.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

IES Holdings Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

IES Holdings, Inc. designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?