WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 680% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 6.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.08. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.4%)

Margin of Safety

-37.4%

Fair Value

$457.50

Current Price

$509.81

$52.31 premium

UndervaluedFair: $457.50Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
67.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 68 in profit

Market CapQuality
$119.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.492/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.08 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (55/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?