WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsMatrix Service Co (MTRX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 1029% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $873.63M). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. MTRX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.04. MTRX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

MTRX

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

MTRXUndervalued (+13.1%)

Margin of Safety

+13.1%

Fair Value

$13.39

Current Price

$10.61

$2.78 discount

UndervaluedFair: $13.39Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

MTRX3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
175.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 175.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

MTRX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$300.46M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.3%2/10

ROE of -10.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : MTRX

The strongest argument for MTRX centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MTRX

The primary concerns for MTRX are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while MTRX is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTRX carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.

MTRX is growing revenue faster at 13.0% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTRX scores higher overall (56/100 vs 38/100) and 13.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Matrix Service Co

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Matrix Service Company provides engineering, manufacturing, infrastructure, construction, and maintenance services primarily to the oil, gas, energy, petrochemical, industrial, agricultural, mining, and mineral markets in the United States, Canada, South Korea, Australia, and internationally. . The company is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?