WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 82% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $5.30B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 9.2%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while SQM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?