WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 204% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 9.2%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
48.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

WAT3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 48.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?