WallStSmart

Fluor Corporation (FLR)vsFederal Signal Corporation (FSS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 520% more annual revenue ($15.18B vs $2.45B). FSS leads profitability with a 11.7% profit margin vs 2.3%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.10. FSS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FLR

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12

FSS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLROvervalued (-6.3%)

Margin of Safety

-6.3%

Fair Value

$47.21

Current Price

$51.54

$4.33 premium

UndervaluedFair: $47.21Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FSS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1427.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1427.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FSS3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.7%8/10

18.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

FLR3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

2.3% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.0%2/10

Revenue declined 8.0%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Operating margin of -1.2%

FSS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FSS

The strongest argument for FSS centers on Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 18.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Operating Margin. Thin 2.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FSS

The primary concerns for FSS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLR profiles as a value stock while FSS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.23 — expect wider price swings.

FSS is growing revenue faster at 18.7% — sustainability is the question.

FLR generates stronger free cash flow (99M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FSS scores higher overall (64/100 vs 58/100) and 18.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Federal Signal Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Federal Signal Corporation designs, manufactures, and supplies a suite of integrated products and solutions for municipal, government, industrial, and commercial customers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?