WallStSmart

Flowserve Corporation (FLS)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 120% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $4.73B). FLS leads profitability with a 7.3% profit margin vs 6.2%. FLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.06. FLS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FLS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.92

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLSUndervalued (+10.9%)

Margin of Safety

+10.9%

Fair Value

$97.10

Current Price

$84.25

$12.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $97.10Overvalued
OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
279.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 279.5% YoY

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLS4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
31.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLS

The strongest argument for FLS centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLS

The primary concerns for FLS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLS scores higher overall (58/100 vs 48/100). OSK offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowserve Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Flowserve Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, distributes and services industrial flow management equipment in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Europe. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?