WallStSmart

Kandal M Venture Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FMFC)vsOn Holding Ltd (ONON)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

On Holding Ltd generates 17437% more annual revenue ($3.01B vs $17.19M). ONON leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs 1.2%. ONON trades at a lower P/E of 50.8x. ONON earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FMFC

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.37

ONON

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 3.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FMFCSignificantly Overvalued (-407.6%)

Margin of Safety

-407.6%

Fair Value

$0.07

Current Price

$0.46

$0.39 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.07Overvalued
ONONSignificantly Overvalued (-754.5%)

Margin of Safety

-754.5%

Fair Value

$5.30

Current Price

$35.16

$29.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $5.30Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMFC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
28.5%8/10

Revenue surging 28.5% year-over-year

ONON3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.888/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.6%8/10

Revenue surging 22.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FMFC4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$10.80M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
1.2%3/10

1.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ONON4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.8%3/10

6.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
50.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-24.0%2/10

Earnings declined 24.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMFC

The strongest argument for FMFC centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 28.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ONON

The strongest argument for ONON centers on Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.88 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FMFC

The primary concerns for FMFC are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 59.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 13.90 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ONON

The primary concerns for ONON are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 50.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMFC is growing revenue faster at 28.5% — sustainability is the question.

ONON generates stronger free cash flow (80M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ONON scores higher overall (53/100 vs 41/100) and 22.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kandal M Venture Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Kandal M Venture Limited, manufactures, trades in, and sells handbags in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, and internationally.

Visit Website →

On Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

On Holding AG develops and distributes sports products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?