WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsXponential Fitness Inc (XPOF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc generates 1465% more annual revenue ($4.68B vs $298.71M). FND leads profitability with a 4.3% profit margin vs -12.6%. FND earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.05

XPOF

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -2.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+14.9%)

Margin of Safety

+14.9%

Fair Value

$81.06

Current Price

$47.41

$33.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.06Overvalued
XPOFUndervalued (+18.9%)

Margin of Safety

+18.9%

Fair Value

$10.32

Current Price

$5.34

$4.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

XPOF2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-1.6510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
24.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.7%

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

XPOF4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$334.90M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-28.8%2/10

ROE of -28.8% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-21.0%2/10

Revenue declined 21.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-81.7%2/10

Earnings declined 81.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : XPOF

The strongest argument for XPOF centers on Debt/Equity, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : XPOF

The primary concerns for XPOF are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while XPOF is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.

FND is growing revenue faster at -0.7% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FND scores higher overall (40/100 vs 32/100). XPOF offers better value entry with a 18.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Xponential Fitness Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Xponential Fitness Inc. (XPOF) is a prominent leader in the boutique fitness franchise industry, boasting a robust portfolio of well-known brands such as Club Pilates, CycleBar, and StretchLab. The company's community-focused model delivers tailored fitness experiences, aligning with the increasing consumer demand in the health and wellness sector. Xponential's strategic franchise framework not only enhances scalability but also positions it favorably to capitalize on evolving market trends. With a dedication to quality and innovation, Xponential Fitness offers compelling investment prospects for institutional investors seeking to engage in the dynamic fitness landscape.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?