WallStSmart

Fonar Corporation (FONR)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 4309% more annual revenue ($4.64B vs $105.34M). FONR leads profitability with a 6.3% profit margin vs 3.6%. FONR trades at a lower P/E of 19.1x. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

FONR

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.02

WAT

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FONRSignificantly Overvalued (-26.7%)

Margin of Safety

-26.7%

Fair Value

$14.66

Current Price

$19.09

$4.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.66Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-44.6%)

Margin of Safety

-44.6%

Fair Value

$227.71

Current Price

$480.07

$252.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $227.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FONR3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.229/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
113.4%10/10

Revenue surging 113.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FONR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$120.20M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.5%3/10

ROE of 5.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.784/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FONR

The strongest argument for FONR centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 113.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FONR

The primary concerns for FONR are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 121.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FONR profiles as a value stock while WAT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 113.4% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (153M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (43/100 vs 38/100) and 113.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fonar Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

FONAR Corporation is engaged in the research, development, production, and marketing of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners for the detection and diagnosis of human diseases in the United States. The company is headquartered in Melville, New York.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?