WallStSmart

GDS Holdings Ltd (GDS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

GDS Holdings Ltd generates 723% more annual revenue ($12.26B vs $1.49B). GDS leads profitability with a 30.5% profit margin vs 3.8%. GDS trades at a lower P/E of 10.6x. GDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).

GDS

Strong Buy

77

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 8.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65

SONO

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GDSUndervalued (+15.6%)

Margin of Safety

+15.6%

Fair Value

$55.06

Current Price

$23.16

$31.90 discount

UndervaluedFair: $55.06Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-32.2%)

Margin of Safety

-32.2%

Fair Value

$12.48

Current Price

$17.46

$4.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GDS5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
30.5%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
207.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 207.0% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.538/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

GDS2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.463/10

Elevated debt levels

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.652/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

Operating margin of 4.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GDS

The strongest argument for GDS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 30.5% and operating margin at 14.2%. PEG of 0.53 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : GDS

The primary concerns for GDS are Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GDS profiles as a mature stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.88 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

GDS generates stronger free cash flow (162M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GDS scores higher overall (77/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 30.5% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GDS Holdings Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · China

GDS Holdings Limited, develops and operates data centers in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?