WallStSmart

GoPro Inc (GPRO)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 2969% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $651.54M). NOK leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs -14.3%. GPRO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).

GPRO

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GPRO.

NOKUndervalued (+16.1%)

Margin of Safety

+16.1%

Fair Value

$8.75

Current Price

$12.91

$4.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GPRO1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$72.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GPRO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$225.76M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-81.9%2/10

ROE of -81.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GPRO

The strongest argument for GPRO centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.07 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GPRO

The primary concerns for GPRO are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 80.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRO profiles as a turnaround stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

GPRO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.66 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (40/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GoPro Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

GoPro, Inc. develops and sells mountable and portable cameras, drones, and accessories in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Mateo, California.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?