Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMorgan Stanley (MS)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$1,018.38
-0.63%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $311.24B
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42
+0.72%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $343.48B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Morgan Stanley generates 15% more annual revenue ($77.83B vs $67.57B). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs 25.9%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).
GS
Exceptional Buy81
out of 100
Grade: A-
MS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 42.3%
Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 41.6%
Earnings expanding 62.4% YoY
Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Revenue surging 28.0% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.3%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MS
The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.9% and operating margin at 41.6%. Revenue growth of 28.0% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 6.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : MS
The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.
MS generates stronger free cash flow (-7.9B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (81/100 vs 73/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Morgan Stanley
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?