WallStSmart

Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 771% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $12.22B). HRL leads profitability with a 3.8% profit margin vs 3.2%. HRL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.85. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

HRL

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.92

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HRLUndervalued (+48.1%)

Margin of Safety

+48.1%

Fair Value

$46.15

Current Price

$23.62

$22.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.15Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HRL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$60.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

HRL4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
5.9%3/10

ROE of 5.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HRL

The strongest argument for HRL centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : HRL

The primary concerns for HRL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TGT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

HRL generates stronger free cash flow (97M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 49/100). HRL offers better value entry with a 48.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Hormel Foods Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Hormel Foods Corporation is an American company founded in 1891 in Austin, Minnesota, by George A. Hormel as George A. Hormel & Company. Originally focusing on the packaging and selling of ham, Spam, sausage and other pork, chicken, beef and lamb products to consumers; by the 1980s, Hormel began offering a wider range of packaged and refrigerated foods.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?