WallStSmart

Humana Inc (HUM)vsMerck & Company Inc (MRK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Humana Inc generates 109% more annual revenue ($137.20B vs $65.77B). MRK leads profitability with a 13.6% profit margin vs 0.0%. HUM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.24. HUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

HUM

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.91

MRK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.0Value: 2.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.27
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HUMUndervalued (+0.6%)

Margin of Safety

+0.6%

Fair Value

$402.40

Current Price

$365.41

$36.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $402.40Overvalued
MRKSignificantly Overvalued (-62.3%)

Margin of Safety

-62.3%

Fair Value

$81.23

Current Price

$130.40

$49.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $81.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HUM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.9110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.13B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

MRK3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$307.25B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.93B8/10

Generating 2.9B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

HUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.244/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.1%3/10

ROE of 6.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

MRK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.073/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HUM

The strongest argument for HUM centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MRK

The strongest argument for MRK centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : HUM

The primary concerns for HUM are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MRK

The primary concerns for MRK are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HUM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

MRK is growing revenue faster at 4.9% — sustainability is the question.

MRK generates stronger free cash flow (2.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HEALTHCARE PLANS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

HUM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Humana Inc

HEALTHCARE · HEALTHCARE PLANS · USA

Humana Inc. is a for-profit American health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.

Visit Website →

Merck & Company Inc

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

Merck & Co. is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Kenilworth, New Jersey. It is named after the Merck family, which set up Merck Group in Germany in 1668.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?