WallStSmart

Hydrofarm Holdings Group Inc (HYFM)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 15141% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $134.25M). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -215.9%. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

HYFM

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HYFM1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
362.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 362.5% YoY

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$119.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Areas to Watch

HYFM4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$5.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-361.3%2/10

ROE of -361.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-32.7%2/10

Revenue declined 32.7%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-4.67M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HYFM

The strongest argument for HYFM centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bear Case : HYFM

The primary concerns for HYFM are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HYFM profiles as a turnaround stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

HYFM carries more volatility with a beta of 2.49 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group Inc

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc., manufactures and distributes controlled environment agriculture (CEA) equipment and supplies in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?