WallStSmart

Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 334% more annual revenue ($1.49B vs $343.17M). SONO leads profitability with a 3.8% profit margin vs -3.2%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

IBTA

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.53

SONO

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for IBTA.

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-31.9%)

Margin of Safety

-31.9%

Fair Value

$12.51

Current Price

$15.12

$2.61 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IBTA1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.109/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

IBTA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$875.39M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.72B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IBTA

The strongest argument for IBTA centers on Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : IBTA

The primary concerns for IBTA are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IBTA profiles as a turnaround stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

SONO generates stronger free cash flow (40M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (48/100 vs 23/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ibotta, Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ibotta, Inc. is a technology company that offers Ibotta Performance Network (IPN) that allows consumer packaged goods brands to deliver digital promotions to consumers. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?