WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsAlliant Energy Corp (LNT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alliant Energy Corp generates 400% more annual revenue ($4.36B vs $871.93M). LNT leads profitability with a 18.6% profit margin vs 7.6%. LNT trades at a lower P/E of 22.9x. LNT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

LNT

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.79
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued
LNTSignificantly Overvalued (-23.1%)

Margin of Safety

-23.1%

Fair Value

$55.45

Current Price

$73.43

$17.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $55.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LNT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

LNT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.454/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.633/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.8%2/10

Earnings declined 5.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LNT

The strongest argument for LNT centers on Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.6% and operating margin at 16.7%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LNT

The primary concerns for LNT are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.63 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while LNT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LNT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.60 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LNT scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 18.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Alliant Energy Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Alliant Energy is a public utility holding company headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin providing power in Iowa and Wisconsin.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?