WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsOklo Inc. (OKLO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kenon Holdings generates 98241% more annual revenue ($1.19B vs $1.21M). KEN leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

OKLO

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 17.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-35.4%)

Margin of Safety

-35.4%

Fair Value

$56.34

Current Price

$65.38

$9.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.34Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OKLO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
93.4%10/10

Revenue surging 93.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
803.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 803.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OKLO4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
17.4610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
29.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

OKLO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.1%2/10

ROE of -0.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 93.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OKLO

The strongest argument for OKLO centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : OKLO

The primary concerns for OKLO are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a growth stock while OKLO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OKLO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 93.4% — sustainability is the question.

OKLO generates stronger free cash flow (-142M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (54/100 vs 32/100) and 93.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Oklo Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Oklo Inc. designs and develops fission power plants to provide reliable and commercial-scale energy to customers in the United States. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?