WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsMicron Technology Inc (MU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Micron Technology Inc generates 7406% more annual revenue ($58.12B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 41.5%. MU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

MU

Exceptional Buy

83

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 10.0Value: 10.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.06
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

MUUndervalued (+61.5%)

Margin of Safety

+61.5%

Fair Value

$992.16

Current Price

$382.09

$610.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $992.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

MU6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$446.05B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.2310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
39.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
41.5%10/10

Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

MU1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : MU

The strongest argument for MU centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.5% and operating margin at 67.6%. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : MU

The primary concerns for MU are Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while MU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

MU generates stronger free cash flow (6.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MU scores higher overall (83/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 41.5% margins. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Micron Technology Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and USB flash drives. It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.

Visit Website →

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?