WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 90% more annual revenue ($2.27B vs $1.19B). KEN leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs -1.0%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-35.4%)

Margin of Safety

-35.4%

Fair Value

$56.34

Current Price

$65.38

$9.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.34Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
93.4%10/10

Revenue surging 93.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
803.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 803.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 93.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a growth stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 93.4% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (54/100 vs 43/100) and 93.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?