WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 10911% more annual revenue ($85.26B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 19.3%. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

PG

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

PGSignificantly Overvalued (-211.9%)

Margin of Safety

-211.9%

Fair Value

$45.90

Current Price

$143.92

$98.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$337.14B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
26.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.81B8/10

Generating 3.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

PG3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.932/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.4%2/10

Earnings declined 5.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 26.3%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while PG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (55/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 19.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?