WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsPPL Corporation (PPL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PPL Corporation generates 937% more annual revenue ($9.04B vs $871.93M). PPL leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 7.6%. PPL trades at a lower P/E of 23.1x. PPL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

PPL

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.80
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
PPLSignificantly Overvalued (-23.8%)

Margin of Safety

-23.8%

Fair Value

$29.07

Current Price

$35.91

$6.84 premium

UndervaluedFair: $29.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PPL2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
49.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 49.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

PPL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.8%4/10

2.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-614.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.802/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PPL

The strongest argument for PPL centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : PPL

The primary concerns for PPL are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PPL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PPL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PPL scores higher overall (67/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

PPL Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

PPL Corporation is an energy company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?