WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qnity Electronics, Inc generates 514% more annual revenue ($4.75B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 14.6%. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$120.26

$97.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
35.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while Q is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (49/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?