WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSeaboard Corporation (SEB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Seaboard Corporation generates 1027% more annual revenue ($9.83B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 5.9%. SEB trades at a lower P/E of 7.5x. SEB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

SEB

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 9.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
SEBUndervalued (+49.9%)

Margin of Safety

+49.9%

Fair Value

$11112.70

Current Price

$4540.14

$6572.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11112.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SEB5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
277.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 277.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.658/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

SEB4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

Operating margin of 4.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-150.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SEB

The strongest argument for SEB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.65 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SEB

The primary concerns for SEB are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SEB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SEB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Seaboard Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Seaboard Corporation is a global agribusiness and transportation company. The company is headquartered in Merriam, Kansas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?