WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsShell PLC ADR (SHEL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Shell PLC ADR generates 34368% more annual revenue ($266.89B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 6.7%. SHEL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

SHEL

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

SHELUndervalued (+71.2%)

Margin of Safety

+71.2%

Fair Value

$280.80

Current Price

$91.12

$189.68 discount

UndervaluedFair: $280.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

SHEL4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$254.34B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
15.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.45B8/10

Generating 3.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

SHEL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.254/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.8%4/10

3.8% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.3%2/10

Revenue declined 3.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : SHEL

The strongest argument for SHEL centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SHEL

The primary concerns for SHEL are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while SHEL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

SHEL generates stronger free cash flow (3.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SHEL scores higher overall (57/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Shell PLC ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Shell plc is a global petrochemical and energy company. The company is headquartered in The Hague, the Netherlands.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?