WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 2900% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $1.01B). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 8.0%. SO trades at a lower P/E of 24.5x. SO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

KEN

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.88

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-60.0%)

Margin of Safety

-60.0%

Fair Value

$47.69

Current Price

$63.83

$16.14 premium

UndervaluedFair: $47.69Overvalued
SOSignificantly Overvalued (-54.2%)

Margin of Safety

-54.2%

Fair Value

$63.08

Current Price

$96.08

$33.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $63.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
73.2%10/10

Revenue surging 73.2% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
122.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 122.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$105.80B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.884/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

SO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.612/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 73.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 43.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.64 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 73.2% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (-144M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SO scores higher overall (56/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?